Video Rubric
|
| Expert (22 – 25 pts) | Intermediate (18 – 21 pts) | Novice (11 – 18 pts) | Beginner (0 – 10 pts) |
| Content (25 pts) | The video demonstrates understanding of the subject matter that goes beyond classroom discussions in multiple instances.
No factual errors are present.
Length requirements are met. | The video contains one or two minor factual errors.
Length requirements are met.
| The video contains one or more errors which misrepresent the content of the reading.
Length is 75 – 50 % of that required. | The video misrepresents the reading more often than it conveys the main ideas.
Length is less than half of that required. |
| Organization (25 pts) | Each new scene is related to the preceding.
The video integrates multiple segments into a cohesive message.
| Some transitions are awkward and leave the viewer wondering "What just happened?" | Individual segments of the video are understandable but there is no clear linkage.
| The video is impossible to follow because of weak organization. Drop the art house flick posturing and be more direct in the future.
|
| Relevance to Reading Selection (25 pts) | The video closely supplements the reading assignment, but does not simply quote verbatim.
All points of emphasis from the reading are discussed. | The video fails to discuss one or two points of emphasis from the reading.
Often the video lapses into verbatim passages from the reading. | The video fails to discuss multiple points of emphasis from the reading.
Often the video degenerates into long verbatim passages from the reading.
| The video may be a masterpiece, worthy of Spielberg or Scorsese: unfortunately, it is not related to any of the reading choices. |
| Graphics and Sound (25 pts) | Lighting and focus are generally of high quality.
All dialogue is clearly understood.
No distracting background noises are present.
Music is used appropriately. | Some scenes are poorly lit or unfocused.
Most dialogue can be understood but a few lines are not audible.
Mostly free of background distractions. | Most scenes are poorly lit or unfocused.
Roughly half of what is said can be heard clearly.
Occasional background disruptions occur. | Persons who frequently experience seizures should not watch your video.
Dialogue can rarely be understood and is not spoken clearly.
Background noise severely detracts from the video.
|
